论文部分内容阅读
对中华医学会系列杂志中有代表性的《中华医学杂志》、《中华医学杂志英文版》、《中华内科杂志》、《中华外科杂志》、《中华妇产科杂志》和《中华儿科杂志》2013年第1期发表的所有论文进行了调查,分析了这些论文标注的基金资助情况存在的问题。发现这些杂志发表的157篇论文中,有64篇论文(40.8%)标注受基金资助,包括55篇研究性论文,5篇综述类文章、1篇述评类文章和3篇病例报告类文章;有19、8、4和1篇文章分别标明受2、3、4和5种基金资助;有5和2篇文章分别标明受同一基金的2和3种不同项目资助。结果表明,部分医学论文的作者在发表论文时,可能存在人为多标基金资助项目的情况。提示医学期刊编辑有必要提醒作者在论文发表时,要实事求是地标注基金资助情况,减少基金资助项目标注的不规范行为。
A representative series of Chinese Medical Journal, Chinese Medical Journal English, Chinese Medical Journal, Chinese Journal of Surgical Journal, Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Chinese Journal of Pediatrics, All the papers published in the first issue of 2013 were investigated and the problems existing in the funding of the funds marked by these papers were analyzed. Out of the 157 papers published in these journals, 64 papers (40.8%) were marked as being sponsored by the Foundation, including 55 research papers, 5 review articles, 1 review article and 3 case report articles; 19, 8, 4 and 1 articles were identified as being supported by 2, 3, 4 and 5 funds respectively; 5 and 2 articles were identified as being funded by 2 and 3 different projects of the same fund respectively. The results show that some authors of medical papers in the publication of papers, there may be man-made multi-standard fund-funded projects. It is suggested that medical journal editors need to remind authors to annotate the situation of fund grants and reduce irregularities of fund-funded projects announcing papers at the time of publication.