王策三先生的《认真对待“轻视知识”的教育思潮——再评由应试教育向素质教育转轨提法的讨论》一文(载《北京大学教育评论》,2004年第3期),激起了一场关于新课程改革是否“轻视知识”的大讨论,许多著文已经从知识发生学、认知心理学等角度对王先生的观点给予反驳,笔者试从代价论的视角对王先生的论点予以回应,即认为新课改“轻视知识”之嫌恰恰是一种必要的合理代价。因为新课改吸收当代知识观合理成分,对知识和知识教育进行更加科学、更加全面的诠释,必然在价值取向上有所取舍。淡化和克服传统静态知 Wang Cesan’s “seriously treat” the ideological trend of education “- Commenting on the discussion of the transition from exam-oriented education to quality-oriented education” (Peking University Education Review, No. 3, 2004) On the new curriculum reform whether the “contempt for knowledge” of the discussion, many articles have been from the perspective of knowledge generation, cognitive psychology and other aspects of Mr. Wang’s view to give a rebuttal, the author from the perspective of the perspective of the cost of Wang to give the argument In response, it is just a reasonable and necessary price to think that the new curriculum reform should “underestimate knowledge.” Because the new curriculum reform absorbs the reasonable elements of contemporary knowledge, a more scientific and more comprehensive interpretation of knowledge and knowledge education will inevitably make some choices in value orientation. Desalinate and overcome traditional static learning