长期以来,我们对史学的分期界定大多是以革命史的范式来建构的,这种界定的方式必然会得出学术依附于政治的结论,但学术必定有自身内在发展的理路,而按照学术自身发展的内在理路,学术则应该走向独立的方向。中国近代以来的知识分子一直在为学术独立而不断努力,但由于中国传统儒学同政治和人伦有着天然的亲合力,所以中国的学术很难完全独立。 For a long time, most of our definitions of history were constructed by the paradigm of the history of revolution. This way of definition will inevitably lead to the conclusion that academic attachment depends on politics. However, the academic system must have its own inner development, but according to the academic itself The inner logic of development, academic should go independent direction. Since modern times, intellectuals in China have been working hard for their academic independence. However, since Chinese traditional Confucianism has natural affinity with politics and human relations, it is very difficult for Chinese academic institutions to be completely independent.