论文部分内容阅读
经过一年多的调查、取证,三易其地,郝志远案件终于在河北省张家口市宣化区法院开庭审理了,10月18日和19日两天的庭审,案件的控辩双方充分陈述了各自的观点和证据。庭审中一个有意思的现象是双方花了大量的时间来辩论唐山市房建总公司的管理制度问题,而不是在辩论郝志远是否有罪的问题。 郝志远案件中有一个细节,按照唐山市房建总公司的内部管理规定和经营方
After more than a year of investigation, evidence collection, three easy moves, the case of Hao Zhiyuan finally held a hearing in Xuanhua District Court of Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province. On both the court days of 18 and 19 October, both the prosecution and the defense of the case fully stated their respective Opinion and evidence An interesting phenomenon in the court hearing was that both parties spent a great deal of time debating the management system of the Tangshan Real Estate Development Corporation rather than debating whether Guoyuan was guilty or not. Hao Zhiyuan case has a detail, according to Tangshan City Housing Construction Corporation’s internal management regulations and business side