侵害人不明的高楼坠物致人伤害案件,自重庆“烟灰缸案”、济南“菜板案”以来,一直争议不断,《侵权责任法》第87条的明确规定定纷止争,使得类似案件有了法律依据。本文对该规定的理论根据进行了探讨,提出高楼抛掷物、坠落物致人损害责任,不能让一个无辜的群体承担赔偿责任的理由,最后阐述了《侵权责任法》第87条的缺憾。 Infringement of unidentified high-rise fall caused by human injury cases, since Chongqing “ashtray case ”, Jinan “chopping board ” has been controversial, “Tort Liability Act,” the clear provisions of Article 87 Contention, making similar cases have a legal basis. This paper discusses the theoretical basis of the regulation, puts forward the responsibility of damaging the property caused by the objects thrown on the high buildings and the falling objects, and can not let an innocent group take the responsibility of compensation. Finally, it expounds the shortcomings of Article 87 of Tort Liability Act.