某医院1台新装DR设备验收检测结果分析与探讨

来源 :中国辐射卫生 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨影响DR设备验收检测结果的可能因素。方法依据WS 76-2011对1台DR设备进行验收检测,得到管电压指示的偏离等9个指标的检测结果,分析了不合格指标的原因并逐一排查,完成对不合格指标的纠正。结果与X射线管系统相关的管电压指示的偏离等5个指标均符合WS 76-2011的要求,且其偏离均处于较低水平;有用线束垂直度偏离等3个几何参数均不符合WS 76-2011的要求;立式胸片架安装存在明显缺陷,在球管最大可调范围内照射野中心和胸片中心无法对齐。结论 DR设备新安装后的验收检测很有必要,可以在早期发现设备性能方面存在的问题,对设备使用维护及质量控制均有所帮助,同时也利于对医疗照射的防护。 Objective To explore the possible factors that affect the acceptance test result of DR equipment. Methods According to WS 76-2011, a DR equipment was tested for acceptance, the test results of nine indicators such as deviation of tube voltage indication were obtained. The causes of nonconforming indicators were analyzed and investigated one by one to correct the unqualified indicators. Results The five indicators such as deviation of tube voltage indication related to X-ray tube system all met the requirements of WS 76-2011, and their deviations were at a low level. The three geometrical parameters deviating from the verticality of the useful wiring harness did not meet WS 76 -2011 requirements; vertical chest radiography There are obvious defects in the installation of the tube can be adjusted within the scope of the center of the radiography and chest center can not be aligned. Conclusion It is necessary to newly inspect the DR equipment after it is installed. It can detect the problems of equipment performance in the early stage, and can help the equipment maintenance and quality control as well as the protection of medical irradiation.
其他文献
本文通过对荣华二采区10
期刊
目的探讨甘露醇辅小剂量地塞米松治疗小儿急性感染性喉炎的临床疗效。方法对我院2007年9月至2008年10月住院治疗的80例急性感染性喉炎患儿,随机分为对照组、治疗组。治疗组给
初中英语任务型课堂教学中老师除了必须设置多层次任务,还应该应用一套针对学生学习效果的评价体系进行调控与检测。让学生不断体验进步与成功,从而激发学生学习英语的兴趣。
期刊
目的探讨赖诺普利(新康)在慢性心功能不全治疗中的疗效。方法将80例慢性心功能不全患者随机分为两组。采用在观察组基础上加赖诺普利,剂量从10-40mg/d。结果观察组治疗前后各个患
目的检测伊宁市0-7周岁健康儿童百日咳、白喉总抗体IGg水平,评估已接种疫苗对人群的保护效果,分析不同年龄两种疫苗接种后抗体水平的变化趋势。方法采用分层多级抽样的方法,
数学阅读不同于语文阅读,数学中的阅读具有特殊性,离开高水平阅读能力,会给数学学习造成很大的障碍,因此,在小学数学教学中,教师要对学生进行科学的阅读指导.但是在实际的教
期刊