陈淮:近来一些学者提出要拓宽“债转股”的渠道。现实情况看,前期“债转股”的成效似乎并不能令人满意。 刘世锦:“债转股”是近年来实施的一项重要政策。作为企业债务重组的一种方式,“债转股”本身是无可非议的。问题是在中国目前特定的银行和企业关系下,“债转股”按照何种思路和前途进行操作。从这个意义上说,目前的“债转股”方案有很大的或然性。如 Chen Huai: Recently, some scholars have proposed to broaden the “debt to equity” channel. The actual situation, the early “debt-for-equity” does not seem satisfactory results. Liu Shijin: “Debt to equity” is an important policy implemented in recent years. As a way of corporate debt restructuring, “debt to equity” itself is beyond reproach. The problem is that under the current specific bank-enterprise relationship in China, “debt-to-equity swap” should be handled in accordance with what kind of thinking and future. In this sense, the current “debt-for-equity” program has great potential. Such as