花永丰同志的《贵州及其邻区汞矿成因的初步研究》一文以测试为基础,并根据一些地质资料,提出分布于西南地台上的大量的汞矿床可能属“沉积一地下水热液成因”。笔者认为该文提出大量测试资料是可贵的。但部分测试资料与我们测试结果有明显差异,特别是引证的地质资料与实际出入较大。本文仅就这一方面的问题与花永丰同志商榷,并望批评指正。 Based on the test and based on some geological data, Comrade Hua Yongfeng’s “Preliminary Study on the Cause of Mercury Deposits in Guizhou and Its Adjacent Regions” proposed that a large number of mercury deposits distributed on the southwest platform may belong to the “deposition of a hydrothermal fluid Cause ”. I believe that the paper proposed a large number of test data is valuable. However, some test data and our test results are significantly different, especially the cited geological data and the actual access to a larger. This article is only on this issue and Hua Yongfeng comrades, and hope the criticism and correction.