对《榖梁》的批评是刘逢禄《公羊》学的重要组成部分。对历史上何休与郑玄关于《榖梁》的争辩,刘逢禄完全站在何休的一面,不仅激烈地批评《榖梁》缺乏经学微言,而且以为郑玄的维护《榖梁》根本不能成立。他对《榖梁》的批评带有墨守《公羊》师法,毫无变通的特点,最能表现刘逢禄重《公羊》的经学特色。 Criticism of “Beiliang” is an important part of the study of “Ram” by Liu Fenglu. On the debate between Hsueh-Hsiang and Zheng Xuan’s Hsi-Liang about history, Liu Fenglu completely stood on the side of Hugh’s departure. He not only criticized the lack of Confucianism in his writing but also thought that Zheng Xuan’s “Bailiang” could not be established at all. His critique of “Bianliang” has the characteristics of “Mods”, which are unobtrusive and can best reflect the academic characteristics of Liu Fenglu’s “Rams.”