论文部分内容阅读
本文欲从亚里士多德在不同文本中提到的两种不同的生成变化的三本原说,亦即《物理学》Α7中的主体(ùποκεíμενον)、形式和缺失三本原,与《形而上学》Λ2中质料(λη)、形式和缺失三本原这两种看似不同的表述入手,详细分析主体与质料两个概念之间的区别与联系,指出,作为谓述对象的主体,既包括为其他范畴所谓述的个别事物,也包括为形式所谓述的质料,其内涵大于质料,而作为本原的主体就是质料;同时,与主体相比较,质料具有潜在的本性,更符合生成也即从潜在到现实的转变的说法。基于以上两点,用质料、形式和缺失这三本原更准确地表达了生成模式。
This article tries to illustrate two different kinds of three primitives that Aristotle mentions in different texts, that is, the subject in Physics A7, the form and the absence of Three Genders, Metaphysics "Λ2 material (λη), the form and the lack of three original three seemingly different from the start of a detailed analysis of the difference between the two concepts of the main body and the material and contact, pointed out that as the main subject of the statement, It includes not only the individual things called for other categories, but also the materials that are so-called materials in the form of content, whose connotation is greater than that of the material, while the substance of the original is the material. At the same time, the material has the latent nature in comparison with the subject, That is from the potential to the reality of the change. Based on the above two points, it is more accurate to express the mode of production by using the three materials of material, form and absence.