论文部分内容阅读
案例某省公安厅委托政府采购中心采购一套专业用显微镜,经过评审,最后确定了两个预中标供应商,其中最低价供应商与次低价供应商提供的价格相差4000元,但是次低价供应商赠送的产品软件远远不止4000元,最终确定性价比高的次低价供应商中标。但是最低价供应商表示不满,并提出了投诉。在最低价供应商看来,赠送条款并未写入招标文件,没写入招标文件的内容评审时就不应予以
Case Provincial Public Security Department commissioned a government procurement center to purchase a professional microscope, after the review, and finally identified two pre-bid suppliers, including the lowest price providers and sub-low-cost suppliers to provide a price difference of 4,000 yuan, but the second lowest The price of software products presented by suppliers far more than 4,000 yuan, the final determination of cost-effective secondary suppliers bid low. However, the lowest-priced suppliers expressed dissatisfaction and filed a complaint. In the lowest supplier view, donation terms are not written into the tender documents, did not write into the contents of the tender documents should not be evaluated