论文部分内容阅读
很高兴看到喻先生的反驳文章,因为只有通过百家争鸣的方式,才能充分阐述各自的见解和理由,让大家来判断哪一种说法更合理些,从而推动新闻学研究的逐步深入。我觉得学术争论与辩论竞赛有原则的区别,辩论竞赛仅仅是逞口舌之利,明知对方讲的是真理,也要用诡辩将其“驳倒”,最好对手三缄其口,让其独擅胜场;而学术探讨则是通过论争明辩是非,希望双方都有充分说理的机会,目的是通过科学思辨使整个学术界的认识更接近于真理。这种认识上的进步,正是论辩双方的共同贡献。有了这样的认识,我相信会创造出更好的学术研讨气氛。
I am glad to see Mr. Yu’s rebuttal essay. Only through a hundred schools of thought can we fully elaborate on our respective opinions and reasons so that we can judge which one is more reasonable and thus promote the deepening of the study of journalism. I think there is a principle difference between the academic debate and the debate contest. The debate contest is only a victory of the tongue. When we know each other speaks truth, we must refute “refutation” with the sophistry. The academic discussion is through the argument clear right and wrong, I hope both sides have the opportunity to fully reason, the purpose is through scientific thinking so that the academic community closer to the truth. This understanding of progress is just the common contribution of both parties to the debate. With this understanding, I believe I will create a better academic atmosphere.