论文部分内容阅读
花崗岩的成因問題,是岩石学中存在的重大問題之一。目前对於这个問題爭論很烈,本文曾广泛搜集有关方面的資料,对不同的观点,加以闡述。先后将岩浆論者和变质論者的意見和根据,詳为分析。然后将两种意見的矛盾和分歧,逐一指出,最后提出对两种不同学說的評述。笔者认为研究花崗岩的成因,首先应該和地壳发展的历史联系起来,不能孤立地考虑。花崗岩的成因是个复杂的問题,形成的方式是多种多样的。因此在讨論花崗岩的成因問題时,首先耍打破傳統的和陈旧的一切来自原生岩浆的观点,而必須从地壳发展过程中的不同阶段和不同的地貭条件来对具体花崗岩体,加以分析研究,实事求是地去解决花崗岩的成因問題,任何片面强調其一种成因的学說,都是不正确的。
The cause of granite is one of the major problems in petrology. At present, the debate on this issue is very fierce. This article has extensively collected relevant information and elaborated on different points of view. Metaphysics and metamorphosis will have the opinions and foundations, detailed analysis. Then the contradictions and disagreements between the two opinions are pointed out one by one, and finally the comments on the two different theories are put forward. The author believes that the study of the origin of granite should first be linked with the history of crustal development and should not be considered in isolation. The origin of granite is a complex problem, the formation of a wide range of ways. Therefore, when discussing the genesis of granite, we must first break all the traditional and obsolete views from the original magma, and we must analyze and study the specific granitic bodies from different stages of the crustal development and different conditions, To seek truth from facts to solve the problem of granite, any one-sided emphasis on one of the causes of doctrine, are not correct.