论文部分内容阅读
目的评价冲突策略量表(中文简版)在流动育龄妇女中应用的信度和效度。方法采用便利抽样的方法在广州市白云区抽取1003例流动育龄妇女接受中文简版冲突策略量表的调查。结果中文简版冲突策略量表条目-总分相关系数在0.18~0.64之间(P<0.01),内部一致性Cronbach’sα系数为0.91,Guttman系数为0.74。其中,协商、心理攻击、躯体暴力、强迫性性行为、伤害各分量表的Cronbach’sα系数依次为:0.77、0.72、0.88、0.93、0.84;Guttman系数依次为:0.64、0.46、0.83、0.89、0.62。经探索性因子分析提取5个公因子,可以累计解释73.34%的方差。结论中文简版冲突策略量表具有良好的信度和效度,可以稳定测量我国流动育龄妇女亲密伴侣暴力的发生率。
Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Conflict Strategy Scale (Chinese version) in women of childbearing age. Methods A sample of 1003 migrant women of childbearing age in Baiyun District of Guangzhou City was enrolled in this study. Results The correlation coefficient between the scores of Chinese version of the short form of strategy and the total score was between 0.18 and 0.64 (P <0.01). The internal consistency Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.91 and Guttman’s coefficient was 0.74. Among them, the Cronbach’s α coefficient of consultation, psychological attack, physical violence, compulsive sexual behavior and injury subscales are: 0.77,0.72,0.88,0.93,0.84; Guttman coefficients are 0.64,0.46,0.83,0.89, 0.62. Five factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, which could explain 73.34% of variance cumulatively. Conclusion The Chinese version of the Conflict Strategy Scale has a good reliability and validity and can measure the incidence of intimate partner violence among women of reproductive age in China steadily.