照我的浅陋所知,自从梁启超、夏曾佑开始用新观点新形式写历史以来,对于中国文学史的总体看法有自己独特见解的不过两家。此外可能还有,那就非我所知了。这两家,一是三十年代周作人的《中国新文学的源流》,一是五十年代茅盾(沈雁冰)的《夜读偶记》。我所见到的许多中国文学史或通论大都不出《文苑传》、作家论以及为一种既定理论或指示作注解或证明。也许林庚的“布衣文学”说可算一家,但我未见全书新本,不能谈,只能谈周、沈两家。手边又无 According to my humble opinion, since Liang Qichao and Xia Zengyou began to write history in new forms and new forms of new perspectives, the overall view of the history of Chinese literature has two unique insights. In addition there may be, then I do not know. These two are the origin of Chinese new literature by Zhou Zuoren in the 1930s and the first reading of the evening read by Mao Dun (Shen Yanbing) in the 1950s. Much of the history of Chinese literature or generalism I have seen does not give a general remark about “Garden of Writings,” writers’ theory, and an explanation or proof of an established theory or instruction. Maybe Lin Geng’s “commoner literature” can be regarded as one, but I did not see the book a new version, can not talk, can only talk about weeks, Shen two. No at hand