论文部分内容阅读
华歆,看过《三国演义》的人想必不会对这位逼宫的大反派感到陌生。相对《三国志》中对其“清纯德素”的评价,《三国演义》里的描写可谓不堪,毛宗岗那句“归孙策又降曹魏,人品又下于王朗”的评价更是将他打入末流。今日并不想写翻案文章,而是想说华歆是我国“现代法律思想的先驱”。话要从《世说新语》里的一则逸事说起:华歆、王朗俱乘船避难,有一人欲依附,歆辄难之。朗曰:“幸尚宽,何为不可?”后贼追至,王欲舍所携人。
Huaxin, who read the “Romance of the Three Kingdoms”, must have been unfamiliar with the villain who forced her death. Relative to the “Three Kingdoms” in its “pure de Su ” evaluation, “Romance of the Three Kingdoms” description can be described as unpalatable, Mao Zonggang sentence “return Sun Cao and Cao Wei, character again under Wang Lang Put him into the wrong end. Today, I do not want to write a verdict, but I want to say that Huaxin is a pioneer of modern legal thought in my country. Words from the ”World of the New“ in an anecdote: Huaxin, Wang Lang all evacuated by boat, a person want to rely on, Xin Ren difficult. Long said: ”luck is still wide, what is not? " After the thief chase, Wang Yu homes carrying people.