八月是二手房交易强征个税政策实施的第一个月,地税营业厅与开征前几天被挤得水泄不通的情况相比,多少有点冷清。门可罗雀的顾客里面还有很多是在8·1大限前办完所有纳税手续跑过来扫尾的人。北京、上海、广州等地的地税营业厅均是如此。表面上看似乎国家通过个税对房产业的调控已经收到了立竿见影的效果。然而,持这种想法的人未免过于乐观,毕竟重征个税还不能做到对炒房行为的精确打击。 August is the second month of second-hand housing transactions levied a tax policy implementation, the tax office and a few days before the levy was packed crowded compared to the situation, somewhat a bit deserted. There are many more cluttered patrons who run tailwinds before the 8.1 deadline. Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and other places of the tax business hall are so. On the surface, it seems that the state has received an immediate effect on the regulation of the real estate industry through a tax. However, those who hold such an idea are not too optimistic. After all, levying a tax can not yet accurately punish the real estate behavior.