论文部分内容阅读
有种观点认为大学语文忽视了应用写作,应该加强这方面的训练。另一种观点认为大学语文不是应用语文,应该坚守自己的人文倾向。面对这种现象,本文分三个方面展开论述:一、争论缘起:大学语文是否忽视了应用写作?呈现两方面针锋相对的观点。二、争论背后:大学语文的定位问题。分析造成这种争论的深层次原因。三、解决争论:大学语文的“体”“用”之分。重新审视大学语文的“本体”和“应用”问题。提出应该明确大学语文的课程性质,方能解决争端,对大学语文的讲授和学习有所裨益。
There is a view that college language neglects applied writing and that training in this area should be strengthened. Another view is that college language is not applied language, should adhere to their own humanistic tendencies. Faced with this phenomenon, this article is divided into three aspects: First, the controversy origins: whether the college language neglected the application of writing? Presented diametrically opposed views. Second, the debate behind: the positioning of college Chinese. Analyze the underlying causes of this debate. Third, to resolve the argument: College Chinese “body ” “use ” of the points. Reexamining the “Body” and “Application” issues in college Chinese. It is suggested that the nature of the curriculum should be clarified in order to solve the dispute and be beneficial to the teaching and learning of college Chinese.