论文部分内容阅读
2011年5月14日至15日讯问全程录音录像学术研讨会在北京召开,会议认为对职务犯罪实施讯问全程同步录音录像制度必须毫不动摇地加以认真坚持并不断健全完善。实践中对同步录音录像资料的法律性质、同步录音录像资料与讯问笔录之间的关系认识存在偏差,制约了讯问犯罪嫌疑人全程同步录音录像这项制度的发展。尤其是现在讯问录音录像资料可以作为证据在法庭上出示,更有必要明确其证据种类。证据是刑事诉讼的核心,解决讯问全程同步录音录像的法律性质,是这一制度走向成熟的关键。
From May 14 to May 15, 2011, a full-scale audio-video recording symposium was held in Beijing. The conference held that it is necessary to conscientiously and constantly improve and perfect the audio and video recording system for interrogation of job-related crimes throughout the entire process. In practice, the understanding of the legal nature of synchronous audio-video recording data, the relationship between synchronous audio-video recording data and interrogation transcripts are inaccurate, which restricts the development of the system of interrogating suspects for simultaneous audio-video recording. In particular, interrogation of audio and video recordings can now be presented in court as evidence and it is even more necessary to clarify the type of evidence. Evidence is the core of criminal proceedings. Solving the legal nature of simultaneous recording and video recording throughout the entire process is the key to the maturity of this system.