论文部分内容阅读
语言学界对于汉语中是否存在中动结构以及中动结构的句法和语义实现形式存在很多分歧。产生分歧最重要的原因是语言学界没有确定中动结构要满足的必要充分条件,汉语中动结构的判断还严重比附英语中动结构的特征。基于中动事件动词的及物性、隐含施事论元和主动形式表示被动意义被认定为中动结构的定义特征,其他特征如泛指性、非事件性、情态性等都是中动结构的典型性特征。汉语受事主语结构符合中动的必要充分条件,同时又区别于被动句和话题句,界定为汉语中动结构。
Linguistics has a lot of disagreements on the existence of the Chinese middle-class structure as well as the syntactic and semantic realization of the middle structure. The most important reason for the disagreement is that the linguistics community does not have the necessary and sufficient conditions for determining the structure of the middle class. The judgment of the Chinese middle class structure is also more serious than that of the middle structure of the English language. Based on the physical properties of the middle-moving event verbs, the implied arguments and the active forms indicate that passive meaning is defined as the defining feature of the middle moving structures. Other features such as generalized, non-eventual, modalities are all intermediate structures The typical characteristics. The structure of subjects in Chinese subject matter is consistent with the necessary and sufficient conditions of middle move, and at the same time it is different from the passive sentence and the topic sentence, which is defined as the Chinese passive structure.