乡村集体企业通过产权制度改革,形成了多元产权主体,增强了企业经营者和持股者对产权利益的关切度,这就为加强企业内部管理增添了原动力。然而,产权制度改革并不能代替科学管理,迫切要求从目前的经验型管理为主转到科学管理的轨道上来。笔者在南通市乡村集体企业产权制度改革调查中,得到如下几点启示。一、产权制度改革为强化企业内部管理增添了内在动力现代企业制度的核心是明晰产权,使企业资产的所有者到位,形成多元化的产权主体格局。南通市乡村集体企业的改制面达到90.2%,其首选模式是股份合作制,占全市乡镇企业总数的67%。它通过“先售后股”形式,遵循“厂长(经理)”持大股、管理人员定岗持股、职工自愿入股的原则,实现了资产的明晰化与多元化。在企业内部,出于 Through the reform of the property rights system, rural collective enterprises have formed multi-subject property rights and increased the concerns of the managers and shareholders of the company over the interests of property rights. This has added a driving force for strengthening the internal management of enterprises. However, the reform of the property rights system cannot replace scientific management, and it is urgently required to shift from the current experience-based management to the track of scientific management. In the investigation of the reform of the property rights system of rural collective enterprises in Nantong, the author obtained the following inspirations. First, the reform of the property rights system has strengthened the internal power to strengthen the internal management of the enterprise. The core of the modern enterprise system is to clarify the property rights and make the owner of the enterprise assets in place to form a diversified structure of property rights. The reformed area of ​​rural collective enterprises in Nantong City reached 90.2%, and the preferred mode was the joint stock cooperative system, which accounted for 67% of the total number of township and village enterprises in the city. It achieved the clarity and diversification of assets through the principle of “pre-sale after-sales stocks”, following the principle of “manager (manager)”, holding large stocks, setting up managers to hold shares, and voluntary shares of employees. Inside the company, out of