《伊利亚特》与《汉宫秋》都是男权社会的男性文本,从君权、人权与女权角度对它们进行别样解读,可以发现其被长期遮蔽的一些意义。前者表明古希腊君权受到一定限制,除普通民众外,贵族可保持相当的人格尊严,后者则反映古代中国君权极度膨胀,除帝王外,包括佞臣在内的任何人都只能是生命无保障的奴隶或奴才。在女权方面,两者则较为一致,它们既视女性为玩物又视女性为祸根,即使是真心赞美女性,也在无意识中将女性客体化,这更说明男权社会贬抑女性的男性意识根深蒂固和无孔不入。 Both Iliad and Han Gong Qiu are masculine texts of patriarchal society, and interpreting them differently from the angles of monarchy, human rights and feminist rights can find some meanings that they are obscured for a long time. The former shows that the ancient Greek sovereign rights are subject to certain restrictions, in addition to ordinary people, the aristocracy can maintain a considerable human dignity, while the latter reflects the extreme expansion of ancient Chinese monarchy, except the emperors, including the minister, including anyone can only be life without protection Slave or minion. In terms of women’s rights, the two are more consistent. They regard both women as plaything and women as the root cause. Even if they really praise women, they unconsciously object to women. This shows that the male-dominated society is deeply rooted in men’s disgrace All-pervasive.