论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨人工流产后计划生育服务干预效果。方法 92例行人工流产的妇女为研究对象,将患者随机分为对照组和观察组,各46例。对照组妇女围术期常规性给予干预和指导,观察组患者围术期行计划生育服务干预,观察两组妇女干预前后生殖健康知识知晓程度变化,并监测两组妇女术后避孕方式选择和再次非意愿妊娠情况。结果干预前,观察组生殖健康知识知晓程度评分与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,观察组生殖健康知识知晓程度评分显著高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组避孕套(39.13%)、避孕药物(19.57%)、宫内节育器(17.39%)占比显著高于对照组(15.22%、4.35%、4.35%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组无避孕措施者(8.70%)占比显著低于对照组(36.96%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组妇女再次非意愿妊娠发生率为8.70%(4/46),对照组为23.91%(11/46),观察组患者再次非意愿妊娠发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论人工流产后实施计划生育服务干预效果良好,有效提升了妇女生殖健康知识知晓程度,并改善了避孕效果,该干预模式应用价值较高。
Objective To explore the effect of family planning service intervention after induced abortion. Methods A total of 92 women with induced abortion were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 46 cases in each group. The control group of women perioperative routine intervention and guidance, observation group patients during perioperative family planning service intervention observed before and after the two groups of women’s awareness of reproductive health knowledge changes, and to monitor the two groups of women after contraceptive choice and again Unintended pregnancy. Results Before the intervention, the awareness of reproductive health knowledge in the observation group was not significantly different from that of the control group (P> 0.05). After the intervention, the awareness of reproductive health knowledge in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The proportion of condom in observation group (39.13%), contraceptives (19.57%) and IUD (17.39%) were significantly higher than those in control group (15.22%, 4.35% and 4.35%, P < 0.05). The proportion of patients without contraception in the observation group (8.70%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (36.96%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). In the observation group, the incidence of unwanted pregnancies again was 8.70% (4/46) in the observation group and 23.91% (11/46) in the control group. The incidence of unwanted pregnancies in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusions The implementation of family planning service intervention after induced abortion is effective and effectively enhances the knowledge of women’s reproductive health knowledge and improves the contraceptive effect. The intervention model has high application value.