自秦汉以降,在同一帝王陵园里,墓葬不同形式的封土标志着不同的等级,这在文物考古界已被普遍认同。基于此,本文拟通过对唐昭陵(以下按习惯称昭陵)陪葬墓中不同封土形式的墓葬墓主身份进行比较,结合唐以前陵墓封土形式所对应的墓主身份,厘清昭陵陪葬墓不同封土形式与等级的对应关系,同时提出对城阳公主墓名位的怀疑并纠正学者认定安元寿墓为冢象祁连山之失误。 Since the Qin and Han dynasties, in the same imperial mausoleum, the graves of different forms of sealing soil marked different levels, which has been generally recognized in the archeology of cultural relics. Based on this, this article attempts to compare the identities of tombs of tombs of different types in the tombs of the Tang Zhaoling (hereinafter referred to as Zhaoling), combining with the identity of the owner of tombs corresponding to the tombs before the Tang Dynasty, Form and level correspondence, at the same time put forward the suspicion of Chengyang princess tomb name bit and correct scholar finds that An Yuanshou tomb is the mound like the Qilian Mountains mistakes.