由于思想政治工作的特殊性,它的作用和效果的发挥具有具体和抽象、直接和间接、短期和长期、外显和潜在等相互交织的特点,因而,要全面、准确地评价它并非易事,我们不可能像评价一个企业的生产经营那样,可以用一系列简单的定量指标来进行。在企业思想政治工作的实践中,在究竟用什么标准来评价考核思想政治工作这一问题上,经常出现如下几种倾向:第一种倾向是以实代虚。这种倾向单纯用所谓看得见、摸得着的硬指标,来评价和考核一个单位思想政治工作的好坏和职工 Because of the particularity of the ideological and political work, its function and effect are concrete and abstract, direct and indirect, short-term and long-term, explicit and latent, and so interwoven. Therefore, it is not easy to evaluate it comprehensively and accurately , We can not like to evaluate a company’s production and management as a series of simple quantitative indicators can be carried out. In the practice of enterprise ideological and political work, the following tendencies often appear on the basis of what criteria are used to evaluate and evaluate ideological and political work: the first tendency is based on the actual situation. This tendency simply uses the so-called visible and tangible hard indicators to evaluate and test the quality and staff of a unit’s ideological and political work