论文部分内容阅读
《论语》是一部有着两千多年解释史的儒家经典作品,但历代注家在解释这部经典的过程中,都要对文本自身的歧义性和语境的模糊性做出富有说服力的诠释。比照这些不同诠释方式之间的差异,阐明先儒在注释《论语》过程中所面对的歧见与困难,并从解释学的角度对此做出分析与观照,既可以让我们在更加本原的意义上理解文本与诠释之间的张力关系,也有助于我们以更好的方式来解读《论语》以及其他类似的经典文本。
“The Analects of Confucius” is a Confucian classics with more than 2,000 years of explanation history. However, in the process of explaining this classics, the ancient writers made persuasive arguments about the ambiguity of the text itself and the ambiguity of the context Interpretation. By contrasting the differences between these different interpretations, clarifying the differences and difficulties confronting Confucianism in annotating the Analects of Confucius, and analyzing and contemplating it from the perspective of hermeneutics, both can make us more primitive Understanding the tension between text and interpretation also helps us interpret The Analects and other similar classic texts in a better way.