论文部分内容阅读
在学术类期刊的选稿和用稿过程中,编辑往往过分依赖于审稿专家的意见,缺乏主观能动性,尤其对于两位审稿专家意见有争议的稿件,常常表现出束手无策。本文讨论了对于某些两位审稿专家意见有分歧的稿件,期刊编辑应通过自身的工作经验和能力,充分发挥主观能动性,从稿件的既定标准出发,决定稿件的取舍。
In the process of selection and manuscript selection of academic journals, editors often rely excessively on the opinions of reviewers, and lack the subjective initiative. In particular, editors who have controversial opinions from two reviewers often show no help at all. This article discusses the manuscripts that some two reviewers disagree with. The journal editors should give full play to their subjective initiative through their work experience and ability, and decide on the choice of manuscripts from the established standards of manuscripts.