论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较胃镜和气钡双重造影检查在诊断胃溃疡中的准确率,探讨两种检查方式的优缺点。方法:在我院临床顺序收集473例拟诊断为消化道溃疡的患者,先行上消化道气钡双重造影检查,再行电子胃镜检查,最终选出103例通过胃镜和/或气钡双重造影检查确认为胃溃疡的患者作为研究对象,比较分析两种检查手段的检出率。结果:对胃溃疡的诊断,气钡双重造影检查方法的检出率比胃镜检查高17%,特别是对胃上部的溃疡诊断,气钡双重造影检查检出率比胃镜高8%。结论:在诊断胃溃疡时气钡双重造影检查优于胃镜检查,但结合两种检查手段可增加准确率。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of gastroscopy and barium double contrast imaging in the diagnosis of gastric ulcer and to explore the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. Methods: A total of 473 patients were enrolled in our hospital for clinical diagnosis of gastrointestinal ulcer. Gastroduodenal double contrast angiography was performed on the upper gastrointestinal tract before electron gastroscopy. Finally, 103 patients underwent gastroscopy and / or barium double contrast echocardiography Confirmed as gastric ulcer patients as the research object, comparative analysis of the detection rate of two test methods. Results: In the diagnosis of gastric ulcer, the detection rate of barium double contrast imaging was 17% higher than that of gastroscopy. Especially for the diagnosis of gastric ulcer, the detection rate of barium double contrast was 8% higher than that of gastroscope. Conclusion: Gastric-barium double contrast imaging is better than gastroscopy in the diagnosis of gastric ulcer, but combined with the two methods can increase the accuracy.