在《一件小事》的教学中,不少教师还认为车夫是作品的主要人物,其根据大概是:车夫是小说正面人笔的形象;这样可以表明鲁迅对劳动人民的歌颂,来提高小说的思想价值。但从作者当时的思想情况及作品中形象的塑造和矛盾冲突的展开来看,小说的主人翁应是“我”,而不是车夫。现就这个问题谈点看法,求教于广大教育界同仁。 作者在作品中着力塑造了“我”的形象。“我”谈过?“子曰涛云”,尽管身穿皮袍,以车代步,然而“为生计关系”,又不得不冒着大风,清早出门。这都说明“我”是一个自食其力的小资产阶级知识分子。同时,作品也写出了“我”的思想性格的两重性:一方面,“我”对当时的社会现实深怀不满,对北洋军阀政府的“文治武力”和“吃人”的孔孟之道表现了 In the teaching of “a small thing”, many teachers also think that the chauffeur is the main character of the work, based on the premise that the chauffeur is the image of a positive character in the novel; this can show Lu Xun’s praise to the working people to improve the novel’s Thought value. However, judging from the author’s ideological situation and the development of the image and conflicts in the works, the hero of the novel should be “I”, not the driver. Let us talk about this issue and seek advice from colleagues in the education community. The author focuses on shaping the image of “I” in his works. “I” talked about it, “Zi Tao Taoyun”, even though he was dressed in a burqa and used a car instead of a car, but “for a livelihood relationship,” he had to go out in the early morning in the middle of a storm. All this shows that “I” is a self-supporting petty-bourgeois intellectual. At the same time, the work also expresses the duality of the “I” ideology and character: On the one hand, “I” is deeply dissatisfied with the social reality at that time, and it expresses the way of the “rule of ruling by force” and the “eat by man” of the Beiyang warlord government.