论文部分内容阅读
我国1997年《刑法》第270条第2款规定:“将他人的遗忘物非法占为己有、数额较大、拒不退出的”,成立侵占罪。关于遗忘物的内涵和范围,新刑法没有明确的规定。因而,在司法实践中,有关遗忘物的认定问题有着较大的争议。如何合理的解释遗忘物的内涵和范围,与判断侵占行为的成立与否有着直接关系,所以在此,笔者试图对遗忘物的内涵和范围进行深入的探讨,以期我们的立法和司法更加完善。
Article 270, paragraph 2, of the 1997 Criminal Law of China stipulates: “The crime of embezzlement shall be established by” illegally taking the forgotten things of others as its own, with a large amount and refusing to withdraw. " With regard to the connotation and scope of the forgotten things, the new criminal law has no explicit provisions. Therefore, in the judicial practice, there is a big controversy over the cognizance of forgotten things. How to reasonably explain the connotation and scope of the forgotten things is directly related to the judgment of the establishment or not of the appropriation. Therefore, the author attempts to make an in-depth discussion on the connotation and scope of the forgotten things in the hope of further improving our legislation and judicature.