随着北京市海淀区法院作出的一项判决公布,社会各界在开瓶费这个问题上又展开了激烈的争论。这个判决认为,向消费者收取开瓶费,属于不当得利,是一种侵权行为,应当退还开瓶费。海淀区法院绕开合同法的规定,适用侵权规则作出判决,值得学术界认真思考。但本案到底属于合同纠纷,还是属于侵权纠纷呢? With the announcement of a judgment made by the Haidian District Court in Beijing, all sectors of society started a fierce debate over the issue of corkage. The ruling argues that charging corkage fees to consumers is an unjust enrichment and an infringement and should be returned to the corkage fee. Haidian District Court bypass the provisions of the contract law, the application of the rules of the infringement decision, it is worth serious academic thought. But is this case a contractual dispute or is it a tort dispute?