论文部分内容阅读
不动产权利人就其危险物或者环境引起的损害对未成年人承担的侵权责任不完全等同于他们对成年人承担的侵权责任。根据滋扰理论,无论遭受损害的未成年人是合法进入者还是非法进入者,不动产权利人都要对他们承担同样程度的注意义务,一旦不动产权利人违反这种注意义务,在控制物或者环境方面存在过失,即要对未成年人承担侵权责任。在确定不动产权利人对非法进入的未成年人是否承担注意义务时,法律应考虑非法进入者的年龄大小以及是否有监护人陪同的因素。
The liability of infringement of minors by property rights holders for damage caused by their dangerous goods or the environment is not exactly the same as their tort liability to adults. According to the theory of nuisance, the property rights holders should pay equal attention to them regardless of whether the victim is a legal entrant or an illegal entrant. Once the property rights owner violates such duty of care, the property or environment In the aspect of negligence, we should bear the tort liability to minors. In determining whether a real-estate owner has a duty of care to a minor entering the country illegally, the law should take into account the age of the illegal entryer and the presence or absence of a guardian.