论文部分内容阅读
武汉抗战时期是国共第二次合作的最好时期 ,在国共合作的基础上 ,出现了抗日救亡共御外侮的局面。这个大好局面的出现 ,与中共长江局的丰功伟绩是分不开的。但长期以来由于有一个王明的右倾错误 ,直接影响了对它的全面、科学、准确地评价。本文分两部分对它进行了再研究。第一部分是充分肯定长江局的历史功绩 :(一 )长江局积极开展与国民党建立统一战线 ,推动了以国共合作为核心的抗日民族统一战线。 (二 )积极配合国民党正面战场 ,与日寇展开气壮山河的武汉保卫战。 (三 )发动社会各阶层 ,推动全民族的抗战。 (四 )恢复、组建了中共南方党的组织 ,为开辟南方抗日根据地 ,取得全民族抗战的胜利和新民主主义革命的最后胜利奠定了组织基础。第二部分是通过对中共内部大量资料的梳理 ,实事求是地分析了所谓王明右倾的错误 ,认为毛泽东与王明在这一时期 ,在抗日民族统一战线的总方针方面并没有原则上的分歧 ,主要分歧是在一些具体的问题上。特别是王明凌驾于党中央之上 ,严重地破坏了党的组织原则。文章对中共六届六中全会的历史作用提出了新的见解。在延安整风中 ,毛泽东将王明在武汉时期的工作错误上升到路线斗争的高度加以批判 ,特别是 1 95 1年 6月 ,经毛泽东修改的胡乔木著的《中国共产党三十年》 ,对?
During the war of resistance against Japan in Wuhan, it was the best period for the second cooperation between the KMT and the CPC. Based on the cooperation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party of China, there emerged the situation of a total resistance against Japan and the nation and a total of three foreign enemies. The emergence of this excellent situation is inseparable from the great achievements of the CPC Changjiang Bureau. However, for a long time, Wang Ming’s Right-deviation made a direct impact on its comprehensive, scientific and accurate evaluation. This article researches it in two parts. The first part fully affirmed the historic achievements of the Changjiang Bureau: (1) The Changjiang Bureau actively conducted the establishment of a united front with the Kuomintang and promoted the anti-Japanese national united front with the core of the Kuomintang-Communist cooperation. (2) Actively cooperate with the front battlefield of the Kuomintang and carry out the war of defensiveness in Wuhan with the mighty karst mountains and rivers. (C) mobilize all sectors of society to promote the nationwide war of resistance. (4) The restoration and formation of the organization of the Southern Communist Party of China laid the organizational foundation for opening up the southern base of resistance to Japan, winning the victory of the All-China Anti-Japanese War, and the final victory of the new-democratic revolution. In the second part, I analyzed the so-called Wang Ming right-wing mistakes by combing a large amount of internal data of the CPC and concluded that there was no principle difference between Mao Zedong and Wang Ming in the general principle of the anti-Japanese national united front during this period, The main differences are on some specific issues. In particular, Wang Ming surpassed the party Central Committee and severely undermined the party’s organizational principles. The article put forward new ideas on the historical role of the Sixth Plenary Session of the Sixth Central Committee. In Yan’an rectification, Mao Zedong criticized Wang Ming for his erroneous rise in work during the Wuhan period to the height of the line struggle. In particular, in June 1951, “the 30 years of the Chinese Communist Party” edited by Hu Qiaodong, edited by Mao Zedong, ?