怀疑论怀疑知识的可能性。怀疑的依据即是怀疑论论证。阿格里帕问题和缸中脑论证是其中最有影响的两个怀疑论论证。传统认识论并不能很好地回应这两个论证。原因就在于它想一劳永逸地解决怀疑论问题,并且采取了不恰当的知觉理论。新摩尔主义以知觉哲学中的析取论为基础,可以说明经验何以能够提供有利于常识命题而不是缸中脑假设的证据,从而有条件地回应了缸中脑论证。新摩尔主义还可以采取新基础主义的方式回应阿格里帕问题。不过,新摩尔主义提供的是一种温和的反怀疑论方案。这种方案其实更适合于认识论。 Skepticism suspects the possibility of knowledge. The basis of suspicion is skepticism. Agrippa’s question and mid-brain demonstration are two of the most influential skeptic arguments. Traditional epistemology does not respond well to both arguments. The reason is that it wants to solve the problem of skepticism once and for all, and adopts an inappropriate theory of perception. Neo-Mormonism, based on the semantics of perceptual philosophy, shows how empirically it can provide evidence in favor of propositional propositions rather than midbrain hypotheses, and thus conditionally responds to intracranial midbrain argument. Neo-Moorishism can also respond to Agrippa’s question in a neo-fundamentalist way. However, Neo-Moorism offers a moderate anti-skepticism program. In fact, this program is more suitable for epistemology.