论文部分内容阅读
目的:对腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术与开腹手术应用于子宫肌瘤治疗中的效果进行比较。方法:对于我院2013年2月~2015年2月共收治的120例子宫肌瘤患者,将其随机分成研究组和参照组。前者于腹腔下行子宫剔除术治疗,后者给予开腹手术治疗,对比两组的临床效果与安全性。结果:研究组的术中出血量、排气时间及住院时间等指标均明显优于参照组,并发症发生率也远远低于对照组,相比存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:在子宫肌瘤患者的治疗中,采用腹腔镜子宫剔除术治疗的创伤小、术后恢复快,且并发症少,疗效优于开腹手术。
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic myomectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of uterine fibroids. Methods: A total of 120 patients with uterine fibroids who were treated in our hospital from February 2013 to February 2015 were randomly divided into study group and reference group. The former in the abdominal cavity underwent hysterectomy, which was given laparotomy, compared the clinical efficacy and safety of the two groups. Results: The bleeding volume, time of discharge and length of hospital stay of the study group were significantly better than those of the reference group, and the incidence of complications was much lower than that of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of patients with uterine fibroids, the use of laparoscopic hysterectomy treatment of trauma, rapid recovery, and fewer complications, the effect is better than laparotomy.