文章坚持从词汇语类到功能语类是一个连续体的观点。在这样的观念下,对“有+VP”结构的性质以及“有”的语类地位加以重新检视,提出如下论点:“有+VP”与“有+NP”可以做归一性处理,其中的“有”仍是一个动词。因其所处句法环境不同,“有”呈现出词汇性或功能性,是一个“蝙蝠词”。文章对此进行了共时与历时层面的论证,并给出方言证据。对“有+VP”的处理遵循了句法的简约精神,可以推及对汉语中其他难解语法现象的解决之道。 The article insists that from the vocabulary class to the functional class is a continuum perspective. Under such a concept, we reexamine the nature of the “+ VP” structure and the genitive status of “有” and put forward the following contention: “+ VP ” and “+ NP ” You can do the normalization, where “” is still a verb. Because of the syntactic environment in which it is located, “has ” appears lexical or functional, which is a “bat word ”. The article carries out a synchronic and diachronic argument, and gives dialect evidence. The treatment of “+ VP ” follows the simple syntax of the syntax and can be used to solve the problem of other difficult grammatical phenomena in Chinese.