对无属性的客体强制性贴上标榜着个人主张的标签是件自作多情的事情。“春蚕到死丝方尽”被大张旗鼓地渲染成鞠躬尽瘁的奉献精神;《关雎》被儒家学者煞费苦心地解读为替君主择偶的金科玉律。我觉得,人具有理解力,应将挖掘深层次的认知作为深化已有认知的动力。用单一的镜片去定义一件复杂又多元的事物是一场简单粗暴的审判。如果认知懒惰,停滞不前,无疑是在前人留下过痕迹的石碑上刻字,在沾沾自喜时却忘记迟早有一天自己的字迹会被后来的风霜侵蚀。如果一代 Mandatory affixing to non-attribute objects tagging personal claims is an affair. “Spring Silkworms to make the best of the best” was rendered in a high-spirited spirit of dedication dedicated to doing everything; “Guan Yu” was Confucian scholar painstakingly interpreted as the golden rule of choice for the monarch. I think that people have comprehension and should deepen their cognition as a motivation to deepen their cognition. Using a single lens to define a complex and pluralistic matter is a simple and rude trial. If the cognitive lazy, stagnant, no doubt in the previous traces of the monument left on the lettering, complacent, but forgotten one day sooner or later his own handwriting will be later weather erosion. If generation