【裁判要旨】对无效的小产权房买卖合同,在利益分配上应当避免利益失衡,防止无效裁判带来不良社会导向,引导当事人恪守诚实信用原则。□案号一审:(2013)思民初字第5695号二审:(2013)厦民终字第2305号【案情】原告:陈栋良。被告:李春生。原告陈栋良诉称:被告因建房和购车的需要,向原告借款145222元,后因被告无能力偿还借款,双方于1998年5月12日签订一份房屋产权归属合约,确定被告将厦门市思明区曾厝垵社区曾厝垵社353号第三层全部以及顶楼阳台和楼下两间房,并加上该幢楼前面左边停车位一间的房屋产权全部归原告所有等内容。之后被告 【Referee motto】 Invalid contract for the sale of small property, the interests should be distributed to avoid the imbalance of interests, to prevent ineffective referees lead to adverse social orientation, and guide the parties abide by the principle of good faith. □ Case No. First instance: (2013) Siming Chu Chu Zi No. 5695 Second instance: (2013) Xia Min Zhong Zi No. 2305 【Case】 Plaintiff: Chen Dongliang. Defendant: Li Chunsheng. The plaintiff, Chen Dongliang, claimed that the defendant borrowed 145,222 yuan from the plaintiff because of the need for housing and car purchase. Later, due to the defendant’s inability to repay the loan, the two parties signed a property ownership contract on May 12, 1998 to confirm that the defendant Ming District Zongcuosuo community Zengcongshe community 353 third floor and all the top floor balcony and downstairs two rooms, plus the parking lot in front of the left side of a house property ownership all the plaintiff owned and so on. After the defendant