论文部分内容阅读
较为熟悉轻武器发展的读者知道,二战中西方国家的轻武器装备是非常混乱的,于是二战一结束,他们都开始谋求研制新枪。北约成立后,在关于步枪弹通用化问题上,接受将美 T65式 7.62×51mm枪弹定为北约制式步枪弹。围绕着口径选择,1947～1956年北约经过了一场“步枪大论战”。在这场论战中,英国提出的.280(7mm)步枪弹落马,英国也未能装备他们自己研制、发射7mm弹的EM2步枪,而改用比利时FN公司的FAL式7.62mm步枪(英国命名为L1A1式)。这次步枪大论战的结果产生了不良的影响,使北约的步枪在50、60年代落后于原苏联。
Readers who are more familiar with the development of light weapons know that the light weapons and equipment of the World War II countries were very chaotic. As a result, World War II was over and they all began to seek to develop new guns. After the establishment of NATO, on the issue of the universalization of rifles, it accepted accepting the U.S. T65 7.62x51mm bullets as NATO rifles. Around the caliber selection, NATO went through a “big riot of war” from 1947 to 1956. In this controversy, the British proposed .280 (7mm) rifle landed, the United Kingdom also failed to equip their own research and development, firing 7mm shells of EM2 rifles, instead of the Belgian FN FAL 7.62mm rifle (the British named L1A1 formula). The result of the rival's great controversy had had an adverse effect on NATO rifles lagging behind the former Soviet Union in the 1950s and 1960s.