论文部分内容阅读
目的观察美宝湿润烧伤膏治疗感染性创面的临床疗效。方法将120例感染性创面患者随机分为两组(n=60),治疗组患者清创后用湿润烧伤膏换药,对照组患者用无菌敷料换药。用药四周后观察总体疗效。结果①两组患者创面愈合率的比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗组优于对照组。②两组患者总体疗效比较,治疗组治愈率为60.00%,有效率为96.67%,经Mann-whitney U检验,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗组优于对照组。结论美宝湿润烧伤膏治疗感染性创面疗效确切,值得临床推广。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of MEBO MEBO in treating infectious wounds. Methods 120 patients with infectious wounds were randomly divided into two groups (n = 60). The patients in the treatment group were given dressing with MEBO after debridement and the control group were dressing with sterile dressing. After four weeks of treatment to observe the overall effect. Results ① There was significant difference in wound healing rate between the two groups (P <0.05). The treatment group was better than the control group. ② The overall curative effect of the two groups were compared. The cure rate was 60.00% and the effective rate was 96.67%. The Mann-whitney U test showed that the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The treatment group was superior to the control group. Conclusion MEBO MEBO is effective in treating infectious wounds and is worthy of clinical promotion.