不久前,我的一位朋友在报刊上发表了两篇文章.一天,在他家中我们谈起了这件事,他随即拿出文章的底稿对我说:“这两篇东西虽然都经过编辑同志的某些加工,但所得的对待并不一样.一篇经修改后,委实比原来的要简练、通顺许多;另一篇发表时却被削去了一半以上的文字,而且被削的还是文章的主要意思部分,因而看来不但显得干瘪空洞,还有点‘文不对题’的感觉.更使人惊异不解的是,在文章的末后竟加上了一大段超出本 Not long ago, one of my friends published two articles in the press and one day we talked about it in his home. He immediately came up with a draft of the article and said to me: ”Although both have passed Editing some of the processing of comrades, but the treatment is not the same as an article after the amendment was actually more concise than the original, fluent; the other published but was cut off more than half the text, and was cut Or the main meaning of the article, so it seems not only appear vague empty, there is a sense of “not right question.” What is more surprising is that after the end of the article actually added a large section beyond this