五十年代以后,多数东盟国家都出现强劲的资本主义工业化增长。研究表明,这种增长是由如下两个主要力量引致的:一些地方公司和海外公司合营的合资企业和发展国家通过政府干预促进各自的经济发展的努力。虽然这种增长决不是没有问题或矛盾的,但其国内生产总值、制造业产出和就业呈现的增长趋势线却未受到政治经济学家严厉的质疑。为了进一步进行讨论,我们有必要从“增长趋势线”和经济周期之间关系的角度来检验一下从五十年代未到现在的经验。这样做不仅能进一步弄清增长是如何在战后和后殖民地亚洲的具体条件下推进的,而且还能提醒我们留意,不至于把资本积累过程中的结构调整进程同经济真正陷入长期危机混淆起来。 Since the 1950s, most ASEAN countries have experienced strong industrialized growth of capitalism. Research shows that this growth is caused by two major forces: joint ventures with local companies and overseas companies and efforts by developing countries to promote their economic development through government intervention. Although this kind of growth is by no means free of any problems or conflicts, the trend line of growth in its gross domestic product, manufacturing output and employment has not been severely questioned by political economists. In order to further our discussion, it is necessary for us to examine the experience from the 1950s to the present from the perspective of the relationship between the “growth trend line” and the economic cycle. This will not only make it possible to further understand how growth is being propelled by specific conditions in post-war and post-colonial Asia, but also to remind us not to confuse the process of structural adjustment in capital accumulation with the real crisis of economy .