论文部分内容阅读
马里翁认为,在现象学发展史上出现过两次还原和三条原理,但仍遗留下来大量棘手的问题和内在的困难,为此必须进行第三次现象学还原即“给予性还原”并相应地提出现象学的第四条原理即“还原越多,给予越多”。马里翁的这一思路及其相关论证受到雅尼考、德里达、罗恩斯利、德普拉和贝努瓦等人的质疑和批判。本文认为,对胡塞尔直观概念的准确理解是正确理解各方观点的关键所在。以此为基础,文章一方面对各方的反对意见作了分析和批评,为马里翁的思路进行了辩护,另一方面在指明马里翁第三次还原和第四条原理的突破性意义的同时也对其中所具有的局限性作了深入的揭示。
Marion believes that in the history of phenomenology there have been two reductions and three principles, but still left behind a large number of difficult problems and inherent difficulties, for which the third phenomenological reduction that is Correspondingly, the fourth principle of phenomenology is proposed that “the more you reduce, the more you give.” This idea of Marion and its related arguments is challenged and criticized by Yannick, Derrida, Ronnsley, Debra and Benoit. This article argues that an accurate understanding of Husserl’s intuitive concept is the key to a correct understanding of the views of all parties. On the basis of this, the article analyzes and criticizes the dissenting opinions of all parties on the one hand, defends the idea of Marion, on the other hand, points out the breakthrough significance of Marion’s third reduction and the fourth principle At the same time, it also reveals the limitations of which.