论文部分内容阅读
目的观察纤维喉镜下与支撑喉镜下声带息肉微波治疗的临床疗效。方法将来我科治疗的110例声带息肉患者随机分为纤维喉镜组和支撑喉镜组,每组55例,分别采用纤维喉镜下和支撑喉镜下微波治疗,观察两组的临床疗效,并比较两组的手术时间和住院费用。结果纤维喉镜组和支撑喉镜组患者均具有满意的临床疗效,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);纤维喉镜组患者在手术时间和住院费用方面均优于支撑喉镜组(P<0.05)。结论纤维喉镜下与支撑喉镜下声带息肉微波治疗均具有良好疗效,然而纤维喉镜较支撑喉镜更安全、经济,并且手术时间短,患者痛苦小。
Objective To observe the clinical curative effect of vocal cord polyp under microwave laryngoscope and laryngoscope. Methods In the future, 110 cases of vocal cord polyps treated by our department were randomly divided into fiber laryngoscope group and support laryngoscope group, 55 cases in each group. The patients underwent microwave laryngoscope and fiberoptic laryngoscope respectively. The clinical curative effect, The operation time and hospitalization cost were compared between the two groups. Results The patients in the laryngoscope group and the laryngoscope group had satisfactory clinical efficacy, but the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). The patients in the laryngoscope group were superior to the laryngoscope group in terms of operation time and hospitalization cost (P <0.05). Conclusions Microwave therapy of vocal cord polyp under the laryngoscope and the support laryngoscope have good curative effect. However, the laryngoscope is safer and more economical than the laryngoscope support, and the operation time is short, and the patient has little pain.