论文部分内容阅读
今年高考作文题是《给〈光明日报〉编辑部的信》。考题中,只给考生一百四十字的原始材料,却要求写出不少于五百字的信来向报社申述,这无论如何是不够用的。怎么办,要求考生“适当补充有关材料”。这样一补充,真实性就很难说了。我们从报上读了一份得满分的考卷。这份考卷补充上的内容是:“澄溪从来是一条碧澄的小溪,绿草野花,溪
This year’s college entrance essay question is “to the” Guangming Daily “editorial letter.” In the examination questions, only one-hundred and forty words of the candidate’s original materials were asked to write a letter of no less than five hundred words to the newspaper for reporting. This is not enough anyway. What to do, require candidates to “appropriate to add the relevant materials.” Such a supplement, the authenticity is hard to say. We read a well-tested paper from the newspaper. The contents of the test paper added: "Cheng Creek has always been a stream of green, green grass wildflowers, streams