人类语言具有间接性,指责/骂人话语更是如此。间接性指责话语也是一种间接言语行为。Searle的间接言语行为理论在阐释间接性话语时忽略了S(说话人)和H(听话人)的个人认知语境,不能解释S为什么绕圈子指责H以及H如何推理等问题。本文运用关联理论的重要观点即明示-推理过程、认知语境、语境效果和最佳关联等来分析间接性指责言语行为,旨在证明关联理论的阐释力强于间接言语行为理论。 Indiscriminate human language, blamed / curse discourse is even more so. Indirect discourse is also a kind of indirect speech act. Searle’s theory of indirect speech acts neglects the personal cognitive context of S (speaker) and H (obedient speaker) in explaining indirect discourse, and can not explain why S criticizes H and how H reasoning around the circle. In this paper, we analyze the indirect accusation verbal acts by using the key points of relevance theory, that is, express-reasoning process, cognitive context, contextual effect and the best correlation, in order to prove that the relevance theory is more powerful than the indirect speech act theory.