论文部分内容阅读
宋刻本《毛詩要義》爲宋代節録體著作,相關學者對於《要義》摘録底本評價較高,認爲《要義》的底本爲宋時善本。由於《要義》摘録底本好,成書、刊刻時間早,瞿鏞、阮元、莫友芝、李霖、朱傑人等學者認爲《要義》於《附釋音毛詩注疏》有重要校勘價值。將《要義》與清阮元嘉慶二十年南昌府學刻本《毛詩注疏》進行比對,同時參考南宋單疏本《毛詩注疏》以及朱傑人點校本《毛詩注疏》,筆者發現《要義》在補正阮刻本《毛詩注疏》的脱文、)文、衍文、倒文,以及對於補正阮元《毛詩注疏校勘記》結論之是、結論之非、不作按斷之條目有文獻參考價值。
The text of the poem “Essential for Mao’s Poems” in the Song Dynasty was a compilation of Song Dynasty excerpts. Relevant scholars appraised the excerpts of excerpts from the “Essential Meaning” as high as the base of “Essential Meaning”. Because excerpts of “Essential Meaning” are based on good works and finished their books in the early time, scholars such as Qu Ju, Ruan Yuan, Mo Youzhi, Li Lin and Zhu Jieren think that “Essential Meaning” has important collation value in Annotation of Explanatory Notes . The comparison between “Essential Meaning” and Qing dynasty Ruan Yuan Jiaqing twenty years of Nanchang House engraved “Mao Shi Annotation”, referring to the Southern Song dynasty, “Mao Shi Annotation” and Zhu Jieren point school “Mao Shi Annotation”, the author found that “ Essential Meaning ”in the revision of Ruan engraved“ Mao Shi Shu Shu ”off the paper, Yan Wen, inverted, as well as the correction of Ruan Yuan“ Mao Shi Shu Shu collation ”conclusion is that the conclusion of the non-cut off the entry reference literature value.