论文部分内容阅读
明清鼎革,学者们将汉族政权的灭亡归罪于晚明王学的空疏无用,因此纷纷讲求“实学”。学者们有的以史治经,有的在外邦传播儒学的经世精神,其中既有对程朱理学的发展,也有对理学的反思和批判,并要求反诸孔孟儒学的真精神。这些思想都具有鲜明的实学色彩,共同汇成了清初的一股实学思潮。实学与董子公羊学都有通经致用的要求,因此在清初,从官方到民间,许多有影响力的实学大师注重研究董子学,使得董子学在清初实学思潮中占有一席之地。
In the Ming and Qing dynasties, scholars blamed the extinction of the Han regime on the idleness of the late Ming dynasty. Therefore, they all emphasized “real learning.” Some scholars use the history to govern the Confucianism, some spread the Confucianism in the statecraft, including the development of Cheng Zhu Neo-Confucianism, but also the reflection and criticism of Neo-Confucianism, Confucianism and Confucianism demanded all Confucianism. All of these ideas have distinctive real-school colors that together make up an idea of real learning in early Qing. Therefore, in the early Qing Dynasty, many influential masters of real learning paid attention to the study of Dong Zixue in the early Qing Dynasty, making Dong Zixue a place in the real-learning trend of early Qing Dynasty.