论文部分内容阅读
《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》第37条对安全保障义务作了专门规定,安全保障义务的限度虽未在该条中直接规定,但结合侵权责任法的救济法性质及最高人民法院《关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第6条的规定可以明确,安全保障义务应限定在合理限度范围内,不是无限度的,而实践中存在安全保障义务的泛化现象。安全保障义务理论的确立、理论依据及安全保障义务的性质都决定了安全保障义务应限定在合理限度范围内,安全保障义务应是适当的、较低标准的义务。实践中应坚持合理限度原则,通过安全保障义务范围的限制和责任限度的限制两个方面对泛化现象加以矫正。
Article 37 of the “Law of the People’s Republic of China on Tort Liability” makes special provisions on the obligation of safeguarding security. Although the limit on the obligation of safeguarding security is not directly stipulated in this article, the nature of remedies in the Tort Liability Law and the " Article 6 of the Interpretation on Several Issues Applicable to the Law Applicable to the Compensation for Personal Injury Compensation can make it clear that the obligation of security guarantee should be limited within a reasonable limit and not unlimited. In practice, there is a generalization of the obligation of safeguarding security. The establishment of theoretical basis and the nature of the obligation of security guarantee all determine that the obligation of security assurance should be limited to a reasonable limit and that the obligation of security guarantee should be an appropriate obligation of a lower standard. In practice, the principle of reasonable limits should be adhered to, and the generalization should be rectified through the limitation of the scope of the obligation of safety and security and the limitation of the limitation of liability.