论文部分内容阅读
对那些从作品出发,富于启发性的批评,即使是苛刻的挑刺,我一向都乐于洗耳恭听;对其中具有辨析价值的话题,我也愿意做进一步的探究。譬如,关于我的长篇小说《人境》,就有人质疑其过于理性,认为人物的成长不是来自成长本身的逻辑,而是来自对理念的服从;还有人认为,《人境》没有充分地写出历史缝隙处人的隐秘经验,等等。应该说,这些观点并不陌生,而且在文坛颇为流行,很久以来被许多评论家挂在嘴边,似乎成为了衡量一切作品的标准,当年路遥、曹征路也曾
For those inspirational critics from the work, I always have the pleasure to listen to even the harsh prickling; I am willing to further explore the value of discrimination. For example, with regard to my novel “Human Context,” some people question whether they are overly rational, believing that the character’s growth does not come from the logic of growth itself, but from the obedience of philosophy. Others think that “human circumstances” are not adequately written Out of the historical crevice of the secret experience, and so on. It should be said that these views are not strangers and are quite popular in literary circles. For a long time, they have been talked by many critics. It seems that they have become the standard for measuring all works. In the past,